How conservative is that?


We are frequently told that Encyclopedia Britannica was a conservative work because of a dedication to the king of England. In monarchies, though, it is quite common that things are dedicated to the monarch without making them conservative in peticular.

By the way, when I looked at the EB of 1998, I read the following:

Dedicated by permission to

William J. Clinton

President of the United States of America

and

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

(EB, 15th ed., Propaedia)

A profane citizen of a former colony is mentioned first, and Majesty comes second? How conservative is that?

2 thoughts on “How conservative is that?

    1. Ah, I see. In 1911 the monarch was still mentioned first, alas I don’t have access to more editions to check a) when the President was added and b) when the President was put first. Do you know more about?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s