‘Shit yourself!’ Wikipedia behaviour in real life

So who or what is 'shit' here?
Once upon a time, I argued with a Wikipedian, let’s call him Johnny. As some German (and certainly also other) Wikipedians believe, it is okay to call an article ‘shit’ if that is their judgement.
I, on the contrary, think that this is a personal attack against the writer of the article; it is just two small steps from ‘this article is shit’ via ‘you are the author of a shit article’ to ‘you are shit’.
But Johnny contested that and held up the freedom of speech. Calling an article ‘shit’ can never be a personal attack, it is a proper judgment about an article, not about the author. The author cannot feel being attacked at all. It’s simply a different opinion about article quality.
So what, I insisted, if you are visiting a friend? You can’t say ‘your curtains look shit’ either. But why not, Johnny answered. The friend could never be attacked by such a statement, maybe the producer of the curtain, and even he couldn’t. You simply have a different taste, then.
I gave up. It would not have helped to explain to him that a person is defined by his or her actions, tastes, opinions. The link between these things and the person is always there and should be considered when criticising.
Some time later, I met Johnny again. We had a nice conversation, and suddenly I said: ‘Hey, your glasses look really shit!’ He saw my serious face and wanted to know: ‘Wh-what? Do you think they are dirty?’ – ‘No, that’s not the point. But they are so old-fashioned and stupid. Did you choose them by yourself?’
Johnny became quite upset, and finally shouted at me: ‘Shit yourself!’
Then I found it more than necessary to tell him that I was just trying out his reaction, referring to our argument about the phrase ‘this article is shit’. He smiled like a farmer with tooth ache and declared his reaction wrong, that he should have taken my alleged opinion more relaxed, yeah.
Well. I know that this is Panzerfaust pedagogics. I apologised, and I promise that I’ll never do this again. I just enjoyed the satisfaction so much.
2 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Recent
- Berlin diary
- Wikimedia Chapters Conference 01
- New board Wikimedia Nederland
- Just another survey on Wikipedia, you lost me
- Movement roles revisited
- When Bismarck phoned Metternich
- New year started in the Netherlands
- Understanding Jimmy Wales, but not free knowledge
- My Wikimedia week
- GLAMcamp Amsterdam: mass upload
- Joint seminar of UEA and WMNL on free knowledge
- New round Guttenberg scandal
-
Links
-
Archives
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (9)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (7)
- April 2011 (5)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Very funny
[...] Diskussionen wird von verbalen Aggressionen geprägt. Es ist durchaus gängig zu sagen, dass ein Artikel “scheiße” ist, ohne zu berücksichtigen, dass der Artikel einen Autor mit Gefühlen hat. Bekanntermaßen [...]
Pingback by Wikimedia Blog » Blog Archive » Cherchez la femme | March 12, 2011 |